Comparing Multiple Mass Drug Administration Prophylaxis Strategies to Reduce Malaria Incidence in Endemic Areas: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Main Article Content

Gresita Novelia Uirianto
Robby Malik Chandra Sudrajat
Carlos Immanuel Miracle Tangkuman

Abstract

Introduction: Malaria remains a major global health burden, with 263 million cases and 597,000 deaths reported worldwide in 2023. Mass drug administration may reduce community transmission, yet the relative performance of prophylactic regimens in endemic settings remains uncertain. This study compared multiple mass drug administration strategies to identify the most promising approach for reducing malaria incidence in endemic areas.


Method: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised and cluster-randomised trials was conducted in line with PRISMA 2020. Scopus, PubMed, CENTRAL, EBSCO, and Epistemonikos were searched. Eligible studies evaluated mass drug administration prophylaxis in endemic or high-risk areas and reported end-study malaria incidence. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2.0. Random-effects network meta-analysis was performed in R, with effects expressed as risk ratios and 95% credible intervals.


Results: Included studies were six trials involving 53,381 participants from Africa and Asia were included, comparing five prophylactic strategies against control. Mass drug administration with ivermectin plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP) showed the most favourable trend versus control (RR = 0.74, 95% credible interval 0.18 to 2.19), followed by mass drug administration with DHP alone (RR = 0.88, 0.44 to 1.69). Seasonal malaria chemoprevention ranked worst (RR = 2.46, 0.41 to 8.33). Ranking probabilities suggested the hierarchy ivermectin plus DHP, DHP alone, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, focal mass drug administration with DHP, control, and seasonal malaria chemoprevention. No comparison reached statistical significance. Overall risk of bias was mainly some concerns, with one high-risk study.


Conclusion: The network consistently favoured mass drug administration with ivermectin plus DHP as the leading regimen for lowering malaria incidence in endemic areas. These findings support larger head-to-head trials to confirm comparative benefit and guide implementation.


Keywords: Chemoprevention; Endemic Areas; Malaria; Mass Drug Administration; Network Meta-Analysis

Article Details

How to Cite
Uirianto, G. N., Grizelda Sabina, Sudrajat, R. M. C., Tangkuman, C. I. M. and Lilirani Kinanti (2026) “Comparing Multiple Mass Drug Administration Prophylaxis Strategies to Reduce Malaria Incidence in Endemic Areas: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials”, Journal of Asian Medical Students’ Association. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Available at: https://jamsa.amsa-international.org/index.php/main/article/view/1079 (Accessed: 15September2026).
Section
AMSC 2026 Indonesia Scientific Poster

References

World Health Organization. World malaria report 2024. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024 Dec 11. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2024

⁠Okello G, Aucamp M. Malaria: a review on its current epidemiological status and management strategies. Malar J. 2026;25(1):132. doi:10.1186/s12936-025-05748-1

⁠Schneider ZD, et al. Mass drug administration to reduce malaria transmission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023;110(4 Suppl):17-29. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.22-0766

⁠4. Smit MR, Ochomo EO, Aljayyoussi G, Kwambai TK, Abong'o BO, Chen T, et al. Safety and mosquitocidal efficacy of high-dose ivermectin when co-administered with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in Kenyan adults with uncomplicated malaria (IVERMAL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(6):615-626. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30163-4

⁠Ba Konko Ciré EH, Roh ME, Diallo A, Gadiaga T, Seck A, Thiam S, et al. Mass drug administration to reduce malaria incidence in a low-to-moderate endemic setting: short-term impact results from a cluster randomised controlled trial in Senegal. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences [Internet]. 2024;2024.07.17.24310593. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39072042/

⁠Dabira ED, Soumare HM, Conteh B, Ceesay F, Ndiath MO, Bradley J, et al. Mass drug administration of ivermectin and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine against malaria in settings with high coverage of standard control interventions: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in The Gambia. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2022 Apr;22(4):519–28.

Eisele TP, Bennett A, Silumbe K, Finn TP, Porter TR, Chalwe V, et al. Impact of Four Rounds of Mass Drug Administration with Dihydroartemisinin–Piperaquine Implemented in Southern Province, Zambia. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2020 Aug 6;103(2_Suppl):7–18.

⁠Hutchins H, Pretorius E, Bradley J, Teixeira da Silva E, Vasileva H, Ndiath MO, et al. Adjunctive ivermectin mass drug administration for malaria control on the Bijagos Archipelago of Guinea-Bissau (MATAMAL): a quadruple-blinded, cluster-randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet Infectious diseases [Internet]. 2025 Apr;25(4):424–34. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39551062/

McLean ARD, Indrasuta C, Khant ZS, Phyo AK, Maung SM, Heaton J, et al. Mass drug administration for the acceleration of malaria elimination in a region of Myanmar with artemisinin-resistant falciparum malaria: a cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2021 Jun;

Tripura R, Peto TJ, Chea N, Chan D, Mukaka M, Sirithiranont P, et al. A Controlled Trial of Mass Drug Administration to Interrupt Transmission of Multidrug-Resistant Falciparum Malaria in Cambodian Villages. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America [Internet]. 2018;67(6):817–26. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29522113/