Current legal status and promotion of telemedicine in Thailand: A systematic review

Main Article Content

Thunyaporn Saengchay
Nanthida Keawthawon
Pasin Larpanekanan

Abstract

Introduction: Telemedicine has been introduced in Thailand for a while. However, little information is available regarding how telemedicine is regulated and how the government currently supports it. Furthermore, there is no systematic review that directly addresses Thai telemedicine law. 


Objective: This study aimed to collect and review progress in the use of telemedicine and current Thai legislation to promote the use of telemedicine in Thailand. 


Method: A systematic literature review was conducted in Scopus and PubMed. Inclusion criteria were English-written articles published in the period 2000-2022 in the fields of medicine, health professions, computer science, and social sciences with accessible full-text. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines 2020. The legal status and present situation of telemedicine in Thailand were also analyzed.


Result: A total of 4,796 records were identified after the initial search (Scopus 1,468 and PubMed 3,328). Twenty-six full-text articles fulfilled eligibility criteria, including the current Thai legislation. The results revealed that telemedicine was a potential strategy for healthcare delivery. Nonetheless, in Thailand it was still poorly developed and regulated. These studies suggest that 5 major factors need to be considered when promoting telemedicine as follows: cost effectiveness, information and communication technology (ICT) development, patient perception, health insurance coverage, and public-private sector partnership. 


Conclusion: Telemedicine is an effective tool to deliver remote healthcare to patients. However, under the current situation, Thai legislation remains incomprehensible and unclear. Reviewing, updating, and implementing legislation and policies should be targeted to promote telemedicine in Thailand.

Article Details

How to Cite
Saengchay, T., Keawthawon, N. . and Larpanekanan, P. (2022) “Current legal status and promotion of telemedicine in Thailand: A systematic review”, Journal of Asian Medical Students’ Association. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Available at: https://jamsa.amsa-international.org/index.php/main/article/view/424 (Accessed: 4December2022).
Section
Scientific Posters (EAMSC 2023 Nepal)

References

Al-Samarraie H, Ghazal S, Alzahrani A, Moody L. Telemedicine in Middle Eastern countries: Progress, barriers, and policy recommendations. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2020;141:104232. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104232

Al-Hazmi AM, Sheerah HA, Arafa A. Perspectives on Telemedicine during the Era of COVID-19; What Can Saudi Arabia Do?. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(20):10617. Published 2021 Oct 11. doi:10.3390/ijerph182010617

Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu-Gjorgievska E. Barriers and Facilitators That Influence Telemedicine-Based, Real-Time, Online Consultation at Patients' Homes: Systematic Literature Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(2):e16407. Published 2020 Feb 20. doi:10.2196/16407

Alshawi A, Al-Razgan M, AlKallas FH, et al. Data privacy during pandemics: a systematic literature review of COVID-19 smartphone applications. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022;8:e826. Published 2022 Jan 4. doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.826

Atta S, Omar M, Kaleem SZ, Waxman EL. The Use of Mobile Messaging for Telecommunications with Patients in Ophthalmology: A Systematic Review. Telemed J E Health. 2022;28(2):125-137. doi:10.1089/tmj.2020.0568

Cai H, Wang H, Guo T, Bao G. Application of Telemedicine in Gansu Province of China. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0158026. Published 2016 Jun 22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158026

Chirra M, Marsili L, Wattley L, Sokol L, Keeling E, Maule S et al. Telemedicine in Neurological Disorders: Opportunities and Challenges. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2019;25(7):541-550. doi:10.1089/tmj.2018.0101

El-Mahalli AA, El-Khafif SH, Al-Qahtani MF. Successes and challenges in the implementation and application of telemedicine in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9(Fall):1-27.

Furlepa K, Tenderenda A, Kozłowski R, Marczak M, Wierzba W, Śliwczyński A. Recommendations for the Development of Telemedicine in Poland Based on the Analysis of Barriers and Selected Telemedicine Solutions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1221. Published 2022 Jan 22. doi:10.3390/ijerph19031221

Hilt R. Telemedicine for Child Collaborative or Integrated Care. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2017;26(4):637-645. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2017.05.001

Intan Sabrina M, Defi I. Telemedicine Guidelines in South East Asia—A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Neurology. 2021;11. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.581649

Jones M. Telemedicine and the National Information Infrastructure: Are the Realities of Health Care Being Ignored?. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 1997;4(6):399-412. doi:10.1136/jamia.1997.0040399

Jung S, Kweon H, Kim E, Kim S, Choi J, Cho D. Preference and Awareness of Telemedicine in Primary Care Patients. Korean Journal of Family Medicine. 2012;33(1):25. doi:10.4082/kjfm.2012.33.1.25

Khemapech t. Telemedicine – Meaning, Challenges and Opportunities. Siriraj Medical Journal. 2019;71(3):246-252. doi:10.33192/Smj.2019.38

Kruse C, Fohn J, Wilson N, Nunez Patlan E, Zipp S, Mileski M. Utilization Barriers and Medical Outcomes Commensurate With the Use of Telehealth Among Older Adults: Systematic Review. JMIR Medical Informatics. 2020;8(8):e20359. doi:10.2196/20359

Li W, Liu W, Liu S, Li J, Wang W, Li K. Perceptions of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease towards telemedicine: A qualitative systematic review. Heart Lung. 2021;50(5):675-684. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.03.081

Lloyd J, Lee CJ. Use of Telemedicine in Care of Hematologic Malignancy Patients: Challenges and Opportunities. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2022;17(1):25-30. doi:10.1007/s11899-021-00642-4

Moses JC, Adibi S, Shariful Islam SM, Wickramasinghe N, Nguyen L. Application of Smartphone Technologies in Disease Monitoring: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(7):889. Published 2021 Jul 14. doi:10.3390/healthcare9070889

Nakajima I, Sawada Y, Ashihara T, Takashima Y. Problems and our solutions for implementing telemedicine systems. J Med Syst 1999;23(6):425-435. doi:10.1023/A:1020512813780

Nigam G, Riaz M. Sleep Related Breathing Disorder in an Adult Female: Thinking Out of the Box. West Indian Medical Journal. 2016;. doi:10.1016/j.jsmc.2016.08.007"

Pappalardo M, Fanelli U, Chiné V, et al. Telemedicine in Pediatric Infectious Diseases. Children (Basel). 2021;8(4):260. Published 2021 Mar 28. doi:10.3390/children8040260

Pengput A, Schwartz DG. Telemedicine in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review [published online ahead of print, 2022 Apr 12]. Telemed J E Health. 2022;10.1089/tmj.2021.0516. doi:10.1089/tmj.2021.0516

Salsabilla A, Azzahra AB, Syafitri RIP, Supadmi W, Suwantika AA. Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Asia: A Scoping Review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:3587-3596. Published 2021 Dec 29. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S332579

Turvey C, Fortney J. The Use of Telemedicine and Mobile Technology to Promote Population Health and Population Management for Psychiatric Disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2017;19(11). doi:10.1007/s11920-017-0844-0

Yu J, Zhang T, Liu Z, Hatab A, Lan J. Tripartite Data Analysis for Optimizing Telemedicine Operations: Evidence from Guizhou Province in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(1):375. doi:10.3390/ijerph17010375

Zhang X, Zaman B. Adoption mechanism of telemedicine in underdeveloped country. Health Informatics Journal. 2019;26(2):1088-1103. doi:10.1177/1460458219868353